I’ve recently come to realize how many things in life are analogous to many other things in life. One pretty benign, or so it seems, event turns out to represent what happens in another completely unrelated area of life.
So it is with the sorority rush process and online dating. I know, I know. It seems like a real leap here, but go with me for a minute.
Way back in the day, when I was even more naive and wide-eyed than I am now, I had the opportunity to go through sorority rush, bid night, pledge a sorority and eventually be initiated. At the time it intrigued me, but over the years, I’ve often thought it a fairly efficient way of sorting through a vast number of potential prospects in a short amount of time in order to make an important decision effectively and quickly. And for many women the need to sort through a vast amount of emails to determine which contacts to spend time meeting and which to never bother with is imperative.
The sorority rush system is actually a highly developed matching system called the preferential bidding system and you can read about it here. In sorority rush, the organizations are matched with prospective members in a manner that gradually narrows the options based on stated preferences of the participants. The result is the prospective new member is eventually matched with an organization where she will live, interact, socialize, study, network, for the rest of her years at the university. It is also a lifetime membership to a national organization. In other words, we’re not just signing a 30-day month-to-month rental agreement, here, folks. The decision bears some thoughtful, considered deliberation. So it is with dating, that is, if you are doing anything that remotely resembles seeking out a partner you could build a relationship and a life with.
Enter the world of online dating, which I did nearly three years ago. I spent some time on that Online Dating Planet for a bit and I noticed some things. First off, all the things they say about men doing the pursuing and women the selecting were true for the most part. Really. I no sooner posted my feeble attempt at a profile, a few recent and accurate pictures, and I was bombarded with emails and winks from prospective suitors. I recently read an article here where some women have thousands of emails to sort through. I never had quite that problem, but then again, I also don’t exactly live in the biggest metropolitan area and I limited the distance of my contacts. Whatever. The point I am trying to make here is that sorting through all those prospective romantic interests is not unlike the Greek organization sorting through thousands of prospective members in order to meet their membership quotas for the year. It is impossible to think of responding to every single one individually and meeting them all? Well, there just isn’t time in a life to do it.
My inbox was inundated. At first, I spent hours, days, weeks attempting to reply to every wink or email I received. It wasn’t long before I realized that was simply ineffective. I had to put some systems in place for sorting. Now the systems and criteria I implemented might be different for another woman, but they worked for me. The same is true in sorority rush. Some house won’t take those rushing as a sophomore, they only want freshmen. Since I was a sophomore when I rushed, this instantly eliminated me from a number of quality organizations. Nothing personal. It was just reality. Did I cry about it? No. I just went with the remaining options which were also very fine organizations.
When we date, there are priorities and preferences that we have that provide the basis for our own sorting systems. For me I eventually determined that I was not going to waste time with a guy who winked or only presented me with a message that said something like “nice smile”, “great profile”, and so on. If a guy couldn’t take the time to create, at minimum, a brief thoughtfully worded message of interest, I wasn’t interested. (And, yes, guys…we can tell when you cut and paste messages! I deleted those too!) This reduced my inbox to a far more manageable number. The remaining people made it through to the next round of eliminations.
At this stage, I put in place some more discriminating criteria. No picture, no consideration. No words in the profile, no consideration. If he was a smoker it was a no. If he’d never been married or was way too young or too old, it had to be a no. These folks usually received a nice, courteous “no thanks”.
After this, I had to consider interests and potential for compatibility. This is often difficult to determine just based on a digital p
rofile on a dating site, but I did find that there were certain means to eliminate those contenders who would probably eventually opt out anyway in the end. For example, the spirituality of the person is important. If he’s out there in religious Looneyville where keeping up an image of doing the right stuff is more important than actually being an authentic, decent individual then we’ll rub and quickly. Why even meet up for coffee to find that out? Save time, energy and coffee money. Just say, “no thanks”.
If he’s a guy who spent all his time out and about with no indication that he occasionally stayed home to rejuvenate and maintain his household, then I was out. That’s a lifestyle that I can’t sustain with a time commitment that would destroy my ability to maintain my own home and my career, let alone keep my kids in clean clothing. I’m wise to politely decline, no matter how attractive he might otherwise be. Our differing preferences in how we spend time will ultimately create problems unless one or the other of us is willing to change and expecting one party to change in order to sustain a relationship (even before a relationship has been established) is not a good sign. It would have been like me saying, “Yeah, I want to pledge that house but only if they will completely redesign their organization to suit me.” So not going to happen!
So, you see how the process of matching by criteria and gradually eliminating the prospects is an efficient decision making tool?
When I was looking to pledge a sorority there were certain things that were important to me: reputation of the o
rganization, involvement on campus, leadership of members, social life, priority placed on academics, philanthropy, networking potential and so on. Of course, the actual architecture of the house and its interior were important to me, but these were minor in comparison to the things that really created the organizations “soul”.
When dating, we all have our own ideas of what we are looking for in relationship. Tall, fit, active, handy, homeowner, non-smoker, spiritual, not spiritual, conversationalist, education, income, etc. All these facets determine what we think will be a good fit for us. It is not a bad idea to have these priorities or preferences. It is actually a good thing and can prevent us from wasting valuable time and energy on relationships or individuals who are not a good fit. If the organization I am looking at has no room for sophomores in their organization, then as a sophomore, I would have been wasting time and emotional energy hoping I could pledge that house and I may have missed the opportunity to become a member of an organization that would have been even more suitable for me. On the other hand, spending so much time about what a guy looks like and how much he makes (having a job is good! Making six figures, not required) is a bit like obsessing about the structure aesthetics of the sorority house instead of paying attention to the quality of life that goes on within that house.
All this effort before even deciding to meet with someone? Yes, pretty much. Oh, sure. There were occasions when I made exceptions. 100% of those exceptions never made it past the first date. Once I began putting some more systematic thought into the dating process, I found I was going out on dates that were more enjoyable and I was actually having more than one or two dates with a person. I wasn’t dreading the proverbial coffee date and more and more of those coffee dates led to something more. Even after the something more, the process continued to be a two-sided matching process as my dates and I continued to get to know each other. Dating is like sorority rush and that’s not a bad thing!
What I’d like to hear from others is what kind of criteria do you use to eliminate people you don’t think will be a good fit for you? Is it looks, income, personality, education, values (if values what values are important)?
What’s your criteria when involved in the two-sided matching process of dating?
I was out with a friend the other day for lunch. She was sharing pictures of the home she and her husband just purchased and are fixing up. As she showed me the pictures on her iPhone, I was impressed with the before and after scenes and how much work they’ve done in such a short time. When I questioned her about how she and her husband accomplished it all, I received a wonderful loving description of her husband and all the things he did seemingly effortlessly on this home. She concluded her praise of him with the words, “He totally puts Husband For Hire to shame!” I thought this was especially touching since these two are past the honeymoon stage, have been together over 7 years, and are very much still “in love”.
1. The Handy Man. This guy can fix, build or renovate anything. You’ll never need to hire a repairman because even if you did The Handy Man could do it better and for less. He has all the tools and knows how to use them. If you find a guy like this, you’ll be able to have the home improvement jobs completed to your specifications every time. You might have to get used to some unfinished projects around the house as the norm rather than the exception. This kind of guy is amazing and if you find yourself with someone like this, spoil him immensely. He will build you a mansion of love from his own bare hands.
2. The Manager. This guy isn’t handy, but he isn’t okay with things being in disrepair either. He’s a conscientious sort who is willing to part with some money on occasion to make sure everything is looking great and in perfect working condition. He makes enough money to be able to pay to put in that slider out the master bedroom onto that redwood deck with a pergola and a hot tub which he also paid to have done. He is too busy making money so he can keep his love and his family in the manner in which he is proud to keep them. While he won’t hang the Christmas tree lights, he won’t leave it to his wife to do it. He’ll hire the Christmas Tree Light Hanger Person to come and make sure that every little light is perfectly spaced and straight and lit. If you find yourself with a guy like this, you are just as fortunate as if you were with The Handy Man. Guy Who Can Hire It Done is so responsible that he won’t let you down. He’s so detail oriented that he won’t let whoever he hires get by with doing a sloppy job. If you are with him, spoil him. He is proud of what he can give and do for you and the family. Appreciate it all and it will come back to you in spades or probably diamonds.
3. The Non Man. The Non Man cannot do home repairs, he doesn’t make enough to make sure that the repairs are kept up around the house by a repairman and he doesn’t care. He’s a fun person, lives for the moment and could care less about responsibility. He’s great in bed, keeps his body in shape and looks and acts eternally 35 even though he may have left his 50’s behind long ago. If he has a job, it’s his 15th one in the last three years. He leaves all the heavy serious stuff of finances, home repair, cooking, laundry and yard work to his significant other or his mother to deal with, stress about and lose her health over. After all, he has to play World of Warcraft. If you meet this man, move on quickly. The sex will be great, but the rest of the time you’ll just be babysitting.
4. The Chef. Highly sought after by career women these days, this guy is just a bit overrated. This kind of guy probably gets invited to a lot of potlucks and has a lot of friends due to his culinary skills, however, cooking a great meal every night is not as useful a skill as being good at the home repairs. After all, and I do speak from experience here, screwing up a really good meal is far easier to recover from financially than replacing that wall that was supposed to be a weight bearing wall and should never have been removed in the first place. So, if all he brings to the table are his culinary skills, maybe you should look further.
5. The Partner. This man is golden. He’s also a rare find. He is intelligent, capable, resourceful, has good table manners and uses good grammar when speaking and writing. He’s smart enough to know not to belch at the dinner table, knows which fork to use in a nice restaurant and leaves the seat down for The Other Partner. He’s a fully vested partner in the firm called Relationship. He doesn’t shirk responsibility, he has people skills, knows how to negotiate the differences in order to reach conclusions that work in the best interests of the other Partner and stakeholders in The Firm. If he can’t fix it himself, he knows just the right person for the job and will make sure it gets done. He does what he says he will do and doesn’t make commitments he can’t keep. He’s confident, not needy, won’t play games but will tell you exactly where he stands. When in corporate meetings he doesn’t seek to force his views or goals on others, but instead seeks to influence or persuade while fully allowing the other parties to make their own choices even though he might be very passionate about his own perspectives. He provides information and options instead of coercing. The Partner, while, intelligent, confident and capable, realizes that The Firm he is vested in is a collaborative team venture and not a top down organization where all the decisions run through the senior partner without consideration of the other entities involved. He works hard and is fully committed to his own success as well as the success of The Firm and others he partners with. He’s not a workaholic but recognizes that in order to be the best Partner he can be, he must take care of himself too. If you are fortunate enough to find yourself as a Partner in a Firm with a man like this stay with the Firm and work collaboratively with this man and you’ll be golden too!
Who can even fight fair against a ghost? I had no chance to start with.
Two marriages which existed mostly because I made excuses for the men and held the marriages together at my own personal health and financial peril are enough. The dating scene has been no better. I’ve mostly met men who should not even be dating because they are a.) married and lying about it (read, The I. J.), b.) separated and working on it (read, still not available emotionally or legally no matter what he thinks or says) or c.) still in love with a past relationship that didn’t, won’t, or can’t work out (read The Beau and several current prospective suitors who are making bids for my time and attention but who haven’t quite thrown the dirt over the grave of their past loves). The graveyard of past loves is not a safe place to go exploring for Mr. Right. 

